Natha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.119/2018 of Police Station Sedwa District Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 317, 304 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that coaccused person Jhini has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from that of coaccused.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-10350/2019]

¶18

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Natha Ram S/o Haka Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.119/2018 of Police Station Sedwa District Barmer provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶21

Surabhii22-

Natha Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natha Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narpat Singh @ Napsa Vs State

Ladu Lal @ Rahul Vs State

Sukhjeet Singh @ Babbu @ Sonu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mehboob Vs State

Dinesh Charan Vs State

Megha Ram Vs State