High Court allowed appeal in part, upholding conviction under Section 363 IPC but reducing sentence to time already undergone. Fine remains unaltered.
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; fine remains unaltered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 376/2016
Raju @ Rajendra @ Rajkumar Son of Shri Lalaram, by caste Dhakad, aged 24 years, Resident of Village Dulara, Police Station Pohari, District Shivpuri (M.P.) At [present R/o Behind Shyopur Stadium Doodh Wali Mandi, Shivpuri Road, Shyopur (M.P.) (At present in Central Jail, Jaipur)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Rajesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.R.Singh Rathore,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
15/01/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLA-376/2016]
prosecutrix without the consent of her parents. It is also contended that the appellant is not challenging the judgment of conviction and his only prayer is that the sentence be reduced to the period already undergone as the appellant has remained in custody for a period of four years and four months.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Teekam/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded by the lower court should be reduced considering the appellant's custody period and acquittal on other charges.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju @ Rajendra @ Rajkumar
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
