The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed an appeal as infructuous. Pending applications were disposed of and the record remanded.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications disposed of. Record sent back.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 60/2006
Gangaram S/o Sh. Prabhashanker Pandya, aged about 65 years, resident of Arthuna, Tehsil Gadi, District Banwara.
----Appellant
Versus
Firm Suhalka And Comapny, 128 Machla Magra, Udaipur through the partner Sh. Raj Rajeshwar Suhalka S/o Khayalilal Ji Suhalka, resident Machra Magra, Udaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. VN Kalla For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
06/08/2019
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal
has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
All pending applications stand disposed of. Record be sent
back.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
124-Sudheer/-
Gangaram S/o Sh. Prabhashanker Pandya
Firm Suhalka And Comapny
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
