The court dismissed an appeal against an accident claim award dismissed as without merits and time-barred, even after granting an application for limitation condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 360/2016
Raghunandan @ Raju S/o Shri Ganga Ram, aged 36 years, by caste Ghosi, resident of Ghosi Mohalla, Jajajpur, District Bhilwara.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Hanuman Bhati for Mr. Sanjay Nahar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Vyas
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
14/08/2019
(2 of 2)
[CMA-360/2016]
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
3-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the limitation condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was permissible and should the appeal be admitted or dismissed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghunandan @ Raju
Man Singh Meena
M/s. M.R.L. Transport Private Limited
The Oriental Insurance company Limited
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
