Single judge dismissed Writ Review No. 50/2018 against the order dated 17.02.2018 in writ petition challenging reservation/eligibility regarding Implementation of NREGA or similar rural employment scheme, holding no sufficient reason for review.
Review petition dismissed; clarification made regarding scope of 'no adverse order'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Review No. 50 / 2018
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11328/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Shrimali
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
(2 of 2)
[WRW-50/2018]
Order
21/03/2018
The application preferred by the petitioner does not call for any review as no sufficient reason has been given for reviewing the earlier order dated 17.02.2018 passed by this Court.
Consequently, the present review petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the last line of last paragraph of the order dated 17.02.2018 reading ‘no adverse order’ in the third last line shall include ‘the impugned order’.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
/zeeshan/
LALITA GURJAR AND ORS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND JOINT SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT AND ORS
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
