The High Court allowed a restoration application to reinstate a dismissed writ petition due to inadvertent delay in complying with requisites by the petitioner's counsel. The writ petition itself was restored to its original number without substantive adjudication.
Restoration of D.B.C.W.P. No. 5464/2017 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Restoration No. 150/2018
in
D.B Civil Writ Petition No.5464/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
: Ms. Aarohi Ojha on behalf of Mr. Sanjeet Purohit.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
27/09/2018
Heard.
This restoration application has been filed for restoration of D.B.C.W.P. No.5464/2017, which stands dismissed in terms of per emptory order passed by this Court on 15.12.2017.
(2 of 2)
[WRES-150/2018]
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that on account of inadvertent error on her part the requisites could not be put in within time granted by this Court. It is submitted that requisites have already been put in.
Thus, in the interest of justice, the restoration application is allowed. The writ petition is restored to its original number.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
DJ/- 35
Union of India
Banshidhar Meena
SANGEET LODHA
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
