Punit Agarwal v. Anand Kumar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Two writ contempt petitions were not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. The High Court dismissed both petitions as not pressed by order dated 24/10/2018.
Two writ contempt petitions were not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. The High Court dismissed both petitions as not pressed by order dated 24/10/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 998/2017
Punit Agarwal S/o Sh. Vishnu Prasad Agarwal, Resident Of Village Bathoda, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 999/2017
Shivraj Singh S/o Hukam Singh, Resident Of Village Mandoli Post Jeen Mata Mandoli, Via Kochor, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Joshi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order
24/10/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press the contempt petition.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-998/2017]
In view of the submissions made, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
A.K. Chouhan/-107-108
Punit Agarwal
Shivraj Singh
Anand Kumar
Shambhu Dayal Meena
State of Raj
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court