This is a brief order where the court disposed of a contempt petition after the respondents informed the court that they had complied with the earlier order. The petitioner did not dispute the compliance.
Notices of contempt discharged; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 677/2017
Navneet Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramgopal Sharma, age about 36 years, R/o Village Talwas, Via-Karwar, Tehsil- Nainwan, District- Bundi.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. HS Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.L Bishnoi on behalf of Mr. K.L Thakur, AAG
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
05/10/2018
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents informs that the compliance of the order under consideration has been made.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid situation, in view of the above, I am not inclined to proceed with the present contempt petition.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The present contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purpose.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Himanshu/- 27
Navneet Kumar Sharma
Smt. Veenu Gupta
Shri Naveen Jain
Shri Ramniwas Jat
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
