Discharge of contempt notices in S.B. Writ Contempt No. 408/2016. Court allowed discharge due to unconditional apology, payment of compensation, and final decision of the underlying writ petition.
Notices of contempt discharged; contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 408/2016
Kishnaram Choudhary And Anr
----Petitioners
Versus
Y.b. Singh And Anr
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shambhavi Mardia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinit Sanadhya
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Judgment / Order
06/09/2018
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 23.04.2016.
Mr. Sanadhya, learned counsel appearing for the respondents – contemnors submits that the due compliance of the above referred order has been made, by paying requisite compensation to the petitioners and that the writ petition in which the interim order was passed itself has been finally decided on 09.04.2018. In view of the facts aforesaid and keeping in view the unconditional apology tendered by the noticees, this Court is not inclined to continue with the instant contempt petition. Notices of contempt are thus discharged.
The contempt petition stand disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Anurag/17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt notices should be discharged due to compliance and final decision in the underlying writ petition.
Kishnaram Choudhary And Anr
Y.b. Singh And Anr
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
