Contempt petition for non-compliance of a previous order was filed by the petitioner. The petitioner's counsel admitted assurance of compliance but requested withdrawal. The court discharged notices and disposed of the petition without proceeding further.
Notices of contempt discharged; contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 741/2018
Smt. Anju Garg
----Petitioner
Versus
Pc Berwal And Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.R. Singhvi Sr. Adv assisted by Mr. Bhavit Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikas Choudhary, AGC
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
05/09/2018
The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 24.01.2018.
Mr. M.R. Singhvi, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been assured of due compliance of the order, subject however, to a condition that the petitioner should not persue the present contempt petition.
In this view of the matter, Mr. Singhvi does not wish to prosecute the present contempt petition.
In these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to continue with the instant contempt petition. Notices of contempt are thus discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Upendra/49
Smt. Anju Garg
Pc Berwal And Ors.
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
