The High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur) disposed of a contempt petition because the petitioner withdrew the petition, citing changed circumstances, even though service of notices was incomplete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 281/2017
Laxman Lal Meena And Ors.
----Petitioners
Versus
Sudarshan Sethi And Ors
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
12/09/2018
In view of the changed circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present contempt petition.
The contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed,
particularly when the notices to the respondents have not been issued/served so far.
Contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J.
Ravi Kh./14
Laxman Lal Meena And Ors.
Sudarshan Sethi And Ors
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
