Allowed

Pramod Paswan S/O Mahaveer B/C Paswan v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC2 Nov 2018SOSR/375/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed applications for suspension of sentence for two accused petitioners in Criminal Case No.444/2017, conditionally requiring them to furnish personal bonds and sureties to appear in court by a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Applications for suspension of sentence allowed; sentence suspended subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each and appearing before court by 06.12.2018.

Pramod Paswan S/O Mahaveer B/C Paswan Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B.Criminal Misc.(SOS) Application No.374/2018

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1275/2018

¶5

Ravi Pasi S/o Chandraveer B/c Pasi, R/o 272 C-5, Bodhnagar Hameerpur Road Ps Naubasta District Kanpur, Up. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail, Kota).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Jaipur

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B.Criminal Misc.(SOS) Application No.375/2018

¶12

¶13

S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1278/2018

¶14

Pramod Paswan S/o Mahaveer B/c Paswan, R/o Village Mahua Ps Maharajpura District Kanpur, Up, At Present Purani Basti Naubasta Ps Naubasta Hameerpur Road District Kanpur, Up. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail, Kota).

¶15

----Petitioner

¶16

Versus State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rajveer Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.R.Singh Rathore,PP

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶18

Judgment / Order

¶19

02/11/2018

¶20

Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

¶21

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that the

¶22

(2 of 2)

¶23

[CRLR-1275/2018]

¶24

sentence of similarly situated co-accused has been suspended by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the applications for suspension of sentence.

¶26

Considering the contention of counsel for the petitioners the applications for suspension of sentence are allowed.

¶27

Accordingly, the applications for suspension of sentence are allowed. It is ordered that the sentence awarded to accusedpetitioners in Criminal Case No.444/2017 (8994/2017) shall remain suspended if each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that they shall appear before Registrar (Judicial) on or before 06.12.2018 and as and when called upon to do so.

¶28

Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court by Fax / Email today itself with a direction to serve a photostat copy of the same to the appellant and an additional copy of this order be also sent to the concerned court by ordinary process.

¶29

Copy of this order be placed in the connected file.

¶30

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶31

Teekam/333-334

Pramod Paswan S/O Mahaveer B/C Paswan v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Paswan S/O Mahaveer B/C Paswan v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajpal @ Raju Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp.

Rajpal @ Raju Son of Shri Sheokaran, by Caste Jat Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Sher Khan Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

M/S Varaha Infra Limeted Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Ravi Pasi S/O Chandraveer B/C Pasi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Ramsingh S/O Shri Bajrang Singh Vs Vijendra Kumar Saini S/O Shri Kanhaiya Lal Saini B/C Mali