The High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur consolidated appeals by dismissing the jail appeal and noting that a subsequent appeal by counsel is pending.
The jail appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal (Sb) No. 672/2018
Rajpal @ Raju, S/o Shri Sheokaran, B/c Jat, age 31 years, R/o Badapole, P.S. Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kandwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
01/11/2018
Appellant has preferred two appeals bearing Nos. S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1506/2018 through counsel and S.B. Criminal Appeal No.672/2018 through jail.
Since the appellant has preferred appeal through his counsel which is subsequent to the jail appeal.
The jail appeal is dismissed.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Arun/133
Rajpal @ Raju
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
