Disposed

Ram Khiladi and Nar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp.

Rajasthan HC30 May 2018SOSA/646/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Supreme Court disposed of S.B. Cri. Bail SOS Application-646/2018 and S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 983/2018 between Ram Khiladi and the State of Rajasthan, applying constitutional and statutory bail provisions to the appellants. The judgment addresses the grounds for bail after conviction.

What did the court decide?

Appellants granted bail on condition of furnishing a surety of Rs. 50,000/-.

Ram Khiladi and Nar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp. — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-646/2018

¶3

Ram Khiladi & Anr. Vs. State of Raj.

¶4

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶5

%% vkns'k %%

¶6

S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-646/2018 IN

¶7

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 983/2018

¶8

Ram Khiladi S/o Moti B/c Gurjar,

¶9

Amrat Lal S/o Ramji Lal B/c Gurjar,

¶10

R/o Bhavpur, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj.

¶11

-----Accused/Appellants

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶14

%% mifLFkr %%

¶15

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶16

vihykFkhZx.k jkef[kykM+h ,oa ve`ryky mifLFkrA

¶17

%% vkns'k %% 30-05-2018

¶18

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶19

izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij fopkj fd;k x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP;

¶20

¶21

S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-646/2018 Ram Khiladi & Anr. Vs. State of Raj.

¶22

fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶23

vihykFkhZx.k jkef[kykM+h ,oa ve`rrky Lo;a mifLFkr gS] ftUgksau s viuh igpku ds dze esa vk/kkj dh QksVks izfr izLrqr dh] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA

¶24

leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dks Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e dh fofHkUu /kkjkvksa esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, vf/kdre rhu o"kZ dh ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k jkef[kykM+h ,oa ve`ryky bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 06-07-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] v-tk-&v-ttk- ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k] lokbZek/kksiqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 19@2012 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 08-05-2018 ds

¶26

¶27

S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-646/2018 Ram Khiladi & Anr. Vs. State of Raj.

¶28

rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k (sentence) dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶29

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶30

Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA

Ram Khiladi and Nar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Khiladi and Nar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Vaseem Ansari and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Nandu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Bodu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Mohammad Arif Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Prem Shankar Malav and Ors. Vs State Medica and Health Ors.