Rajendra Harijan v. State of Rajasthan through Pp
Case brief
What is this about?
The Supreme Court allowed a special leave petition filed under Article 226 challenging the Jaipur High Court's remand judgment, granting the petitioner two interim orders to address the pending nature of the underlying criminal proceedings and court order.
What did the court decide?
The petition was allowed. The petitioner was directed to file a status report on the pending cases and obtain the impugned judgment. Case Diary No. 231 of 2018 was kept attached for a period of time.
What the court decided
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
%% vk ns 'k %%
,dy ihB QkStnkjh fofo/k ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk&i= la[;k 529@2018 vUrxZr ,dy ihB QkStnkjh vihy la[;k 163@2018
Petitioner/Appeallant :
Rajendra Harijan S/o Genda Ram Harijan B/c Harijan, R/o Kunda Kacchi Basti, Jhalana Mahal, Infront of J.K. Plot, PS Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. (Presently Confined in Central Jail, Jaipur).
VERSUS
Respondent :
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
vkns'k fnukad % 4-5-2018
%% mifLFkr %%
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court remand in criminal trial was arbitrary given the petitioner was at large during that period.
Whether the petition filed under Article 226 challenging the High Court judgment should be allowed on its merits though the underlying dispute remains pending.
Who should bear the burden for filing the status report on the underlying High Court and Crime Branch case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendra Harijan S/o Genda Ram Harijan
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/529/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court