High Court reduced the amount required as bail security in a criminal appeal from three lakhs to one lakh, considering the accused was already in judicial custody. The respondent was given time to file proper bonds.
Security reduced from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000; time granted to file bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-445/2018 Amit Kumar Vs. CBI
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-445/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 701/2018
Amit Kumar S/o Sh. Bajrang Lal B/c Mahajan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Harsauli, Police Station Kharthal, District Alwar, Presently R/o 49-B, K.g.n. Bagh, Shiv Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur Raj., (Then S.a.s. Abhikarta 299, Post Office Harsauli, District Alwar), (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Accused-Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation, Branch Jaipur, Through Pp.
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh foosd xks;yA fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd Jh v'ouh dqekj 'kekZA
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-445/2018 Amit Kumar Vs. CBI
%% vkns'k %% 04-05-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
bl U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkys[k rych gsrq vkns'k fn;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu vfHkys[k izkIr ugha gqvk gSA bl dze esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd vihykFkhZ U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa vU; lgvfHk;qDr dh tekur gks pqdh gS] vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu ij cgl lquh tk,A
;ksX; fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd dks bl ckcr dksbZ ,srjkt ugha gSA
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd izdj.k esa lgvfHk;qDr eksguflag pkSgku dk ltk LFkxu vkosnu bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ls fnukad 20-02-2018 dks tqekZuk tek djkus dh 'krZ ij Lohdkj gks pqdk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd led{k ihB }kjk ikap yk[k :i; s tekZuk tek djkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k Fkk] ftlds dze esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikap yk[k :i; s ds LFkku ij ,d yk[k :i; s tqekZuk fd;k x;kA bl dze esa mudk dFku jgk fd vihykFkhZ Hkh mlh vuqikr esa ikap yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k LosPNk ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tek djkus
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-445/2018 Amit Kumar Vs. CBI
dks rS;kj gSA og U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA jkf'k tek djkus ds dze es a muds }kjk izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k x;k] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA
;ksX; fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA cgl ds nkSjku vihykFkhZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk }kjk fyf[kr esa izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj ikap yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k LosPNk ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tek djkus ds ckcr tks lgefr iznku dh xbZ gS] mldks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ,oa lgvfHk;qDr dh tekur led{k ihB ls Lohdkj gksus ds rF; dks en~nsutj j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk] vihykFkhZ }kjk ikap yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tek djkus dh 'krZ ij ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ }kjk ikap yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tek djkus dh 'krZ ij gh ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ vfer dqekj bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 04-062018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq nks yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ,d&,d yk[k :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns ,oa ikap yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k tek djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k]
4
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-445/2018 Amit Kumar Vs. CBI
lhchvkbZ izdj.k] dze&3] t;iqj }kjk fof'k"B vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k &08@2017 ¼28@2010½ esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 30-01-2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the security of Rs. 3,00,000 may be reduced to Rs. 10,000.
Whether fresh security should be called for despite the accused being in lawful custody.
Amit Kumar
Central Bureau Of Investigation
J. egsUnz ekgs'ojh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
