An appeal against a decision related to service regularization was disposed of as infructuous due to the regularization of the respondent's services. The judgment relies on the Supreme Court decision in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi without explicit citation in text.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1123/2013
The Chairman Cum Managing Director, SFCI & Ors.
----Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Kumar Tomar & Anr.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manish Shishodia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Trivedi
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/12/2018
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
21-Zeeshan/-
The Chairman Cum Managing Director, SFCI & Ors.
Mukesh Kumar Tomar & Anr.
Praadeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
