This court disposed of a writ petition concerning Safai Karamchari recruitment by relying on a larger judgment directing individual issue resolution through a redressal committee, which was subsequently constituted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 16032/2018
Upendra Sen S/o Shri Ramesh Sen, Aged About 24 Years, By Caste Sen, Resident Of 222 Sector 17 Choupasni Housing Board, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajat Arora. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parvez for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order
12/10/2018
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner raising issues pertaining to the recruitment for the post of Safai Karamchari.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the judgment in Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.10496/2018, decided on 30.08.2018, wherein even for the issues, which are not covered by the judgment, it was directed that the petitioners therein would represent before the respondents and a further direction has been given for consideration by a proper redressal committee.
It is further submitted that pursuant to the said direction, a redressal committee has been constituted by order dated 27.09.2018 by the respondents and therefore, in light of the said
(2 of 2)
[CW-16032/2018]
judgment and constitution of the committee, the petitioner may also approach the said committee with the grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), it was directed as under :-
“58. Learned counsel for the respondents further stated that the due reservation of Ex-servicemen, handicapped and women categories alongwith the horizontal reservation have been strictly adopted, in accordance with law. However, any representation, if given regarding non-applicability of the reservation of handicapped persons or ex-servicemen, the same shall also be considered and decided by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
In view of the above directions and the fact that a committee has been constituted, the writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of with similar directions as given in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra).
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
sumit-270
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding recruitment for Safai Karamchari post requires adjudication in view of the judgment in Ravi Jajot.
Whether a Constitution Bench direction to decide individual issues via a redressal committee and subsequent listing therefor merits continuation of this writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on¶13
Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.10496/2018 decided on 30.08.2018
Upendra Sen
State Of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
