Naveen Saini and Ors. v. Shankar Lal Saini and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners moved this writ petition, later advised it was no longer necessary
What did the court decide?
Writ proceedings closed
Petitioners moved this writ petition, later advised it was no longer necessary
Writ proceedings closed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 9545/2017
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv S Choudhary For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
14/11/2018
Counsel for the petitioners under instructions gives out that in view of subsequent events, writ application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, writ proceedings stand closed.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J
Pooja/22
Naveen Saini
Mansi
Meera Devi
Shankar Lal Saini
Ramsingh
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court