Allowed

Bhinya Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Dec 2018CW/9097/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this single-judge order, Justice Arun Bhansali allowed the writ petition, declaring the petitioner entitled to a revised pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 for the third selection grade, correcting an earlier interpretation of notifications dated 25.1.1992 and 17.02.1998, and directing the respondents to execute this entitlement within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner declared entitled to pay scale Rs.5000-8000 instead of Rs.4000-6000 as third selection grade; execution directed within six months.

Bhinya Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 9097/2018

¶3

Bhinya Ram S/o Ganesh Ram Ji, Aged About 63 Years, Village Pundlu, Tehsil Merta District Nagaur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶7

The Chief Engineer (Administartion), Public Health Engineering Department Government Of Rajasthan Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Nagaur, Nagaur (Raj)

¶9

The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Rural Subdivision Merta City, Dist Nagaur Raj

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.S. Bissa. For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.K. Mehta.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

19/12/2018

Heard.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a decision rendered in Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.:S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008 , decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No.14932/2012.

¶17

Learned Single Judge of this Court, while deciding the case of Sohanlal (supra) has relied on an earlier judgment in Sharvan

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-9097/2018]

¶20

Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2156/2007, decided on 05.09.2008). The Court held:-

¶21

“In view of whatever said above, this petition for writ deserves acceptance and, therefore, the same is allowed. The respondents are directed to allow selection grade to the petitioner on completion of 18 years of service as per para 5 of the notifications dated 25.1.1992 and 17.02.1998. The petitioner is declared entitled for getting the pay scale of Rs.1400-2600 (Rs.5000-8000) as second selection grade on completion of 18 years of service and the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 on completion of 27 years of service as the third selection grade. The entitlement as declared above is required to be executed by the respondents within a period of six months from today.”

¶22

In this view of the matter, the instant petition is also allowed in the same terms and the petitioner is declared entitled for the grant of pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 instead of Rs.4000-6000 as third selection grade.

¶23

The entitlement as above be executed within a period of six months from today.

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶25

171-Rmathur/-

Bhinya Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhinya Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs the University Grants Commission

Rajendra Kumar Joshi Vs Rsrtc and Ors.

Natwar Lal Vs Distt.and Sessions Judge, Dungarpur and Anr.

Kanhaiya Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Reena Rani Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Dharu Vs State of Rajasthan