Allowed

Ajay Dharu v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Dec 2018CW/15987/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a writ petition concerning the recruitment process for Safai Karamchari in Jodhpur. The High Court allowed the petition by relying on the decisions in Ravi Jajot, directing the respondents to pass speaking orders on undecided issues within thirty days.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed in terms of judgment in Ravi Jajot; directions issued for speaking orders on undecided issues within thirty days.

Ajay Dharu Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ No. 15987/2018

¶4

Ajay Dharu S/o Rajendra Dharu, Aged About 34 Years, Ram Bagh, Kaga Colony, Harijan Basti, Jodhpur

¶5

Dinesh S/o Jai Narayan, Aged About 37 Years, Ram Bagh, Kaga Colony, Harijan Basti, Jodhpur

¶6

Meenakshi W/o Dinesh, Aged About 35 Years, Ram Bagh, Kaga Colony, Harijan Basti, Jodhpur

¶7

Aarti W/o Ajay, Aged About 35 Years, Ram Bagh, Kaga Colony, Harijan Basti, Jodhpur

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶11

The Director, Local Self, Department Of Local Self, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶12

The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Purohit. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parvej for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶16

Order

¶17

19/12/2018

¶18

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10496/2018 , decided on 30.8.2018 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in terms of the said judgment.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-15987/2018]

¶21

In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court after dealing with the issues, raised therein, inter alia, directed as under:-

¶22

“97. All these writ petitions arising out of recruitment process of Safai Karamchari in pursuance of the advertisement dated 13.04.2018, stand disposed of, as per the above observations and directions. However, it is made clear that any issue, which has been pleaded, but not decided by this judgment, shall require the petitioners to file representation before the respondents, which shall be decided by the respondents by passing a respective speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.”

¶23

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in terms of judgment in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra) with similar directions as noticed hereinbefore.

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶25

96-Rmathur/-

Ajay Dharu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Dharu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs the University Grants Commission

Rajendra Kumar Joshi Vs Rsrtc and Ors.

Natwar Lal Vs Distt.and Sessions Judge, Dungarpur and Anr.

Bhinya Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kanhaiya Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Reena Rani Vs State of Rajasthan