Disposed

Smt Sarita Devi Yadav v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC24 Apr 2018CW/8800/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged non-upload of information on 'SHALA DARSHAN' portal despite corrections. Court dismissed writ proceedings, directing petitioner to submit a representation ventilating grievances, with State-respondents mandated to decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit a comprehensive representation; State-respondents directed to decide within four weeks.

Smt Sarita Devi Yadav Vs State of Raj and Ors. — RTI and Transparency | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 8800/2018

¶3

Smt Sarita Devi Yadav, Daughter Of Shri Sugga Ram Yadav, Wife Of Shri Ram Chandra Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Post Bishangarh, Via Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur

¶7

Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner

¶8

The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bhilwara, Rajasthan

¶9

Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Jahajpur, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kalwania For Respondent(s) :

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶13

Order

¶14

25/04/2018

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the necessary corrections carried out by the State-respondents with reference to the subject of the petitioner as reflected from document Annexure-5; the information has not been uploaded on the portal 'SHALA DARSHAN'.

¶16

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and on a perusal of the materials available on record; for the present, the petitioner is required to address a comprehensive representation to the State-respondents.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-8800/2018]

¶19

Accordingly, the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the State-respondents, ventilating her grievances, within two weeks hereinafter.

¶20

In case, a representation is so addressed within the period aforesaid, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible; however, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶21

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶22

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶23

Pcg/166

Smt Sarita Devi Yadav v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sarita Devi Yadav v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Singh Vs State Education Departmentors

Devi Sahay Sharma Vs R S R T C and Ors.

Sanjay Choudhary Vs State Education Department Ors.

Priyanka Kumari Prajapat Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Bharat Singh Gurjar Vs State Local Self Dept Anr.

Jogender Singh Vs State Education Department Ors.