High Court disposed of a writ application regarding the petitioner's representation in a case answered by a coordinate bench decision in Prahlad Singh case.
Direction to file comprehensive representation; direction to State-respondents to decide within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 8554/2018
Devi Sahay Sharma S/o Sh. Girraj Prasad Shrma By Caste Brahmin, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village Post Santha Tehsil Mahuwa District Dausa (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
23/04/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications lead case being S. B. Civil Writ petition Number 14748/2014: Prahlad Singh Versus The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors., decided on 28th September, 2015.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a
(2 of 2)
[CW-8554/2018]
time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Prahlad Singh (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
In case, claim of the petitioners is found covered by the adjudication aforesaid in the case of Prahlad Singh (supra), the petitioner be also accorded the same benefit.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/178
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prahlad Singh Versus The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.Explained¶14
S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 14748/2014: Prahlad Singh Versus The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.
Devi Sahay Sharma
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
Parties & counsel
