Allowed

Purushottam Lal Paliwal v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2018CW/7956/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition by relying on the earlier judgment in Daulat Ram, directing the respondent Corporation to conform to previous directions regarding employee dues.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was allowed with directions to comply with the earlier judgment in Daulat Ram regarding the payment of retired employees' dues and interest.

Purushottam Lal Paliwal Vs Rsrtc and Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 7956/2018

¶3

Purushottam Lal Paliwal Son Of Shri Dhaneshwar Paliwal, By Caste Paliwal, Resident Of Brahmanon Ka Chouraha, Umar Bawadi Marg, Charbhuja, District Rajsamand.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director

¶7

The Chief Manager, Bhilwara Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bhilwara.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Irfan Gouri. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

09/10/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Suniel Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-7956/2018]

¶18

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶19

directed as under :-

¶20

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶21

No order as to costs.”

¶22

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶23

(ARUN BHANSALI),J.

¶24

Sumit-18

Purushottam Lal Paliwal v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purushottam Lal Paliwal v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Shekhawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Madhu Ujwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Reena Joshi and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sharda Kaswa Vs State and Ors.

Kamlesh Poonia Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Suthar Vs State of Rajasthan