Single judge order allowing a writ petition seeking 5% marks relaxation at UG and PG levels and good academic record assessment for reserved category candidates based on UGC Regulations, citing Lalit Kumar precedent.
Relaxation of 5% marks at UG and PG levels and assessment of good academic record for SC/ST/OBC and PH category candidates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 11923/2018
Madhu Ujwal D/o Sh. Abhay Ujwal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ujjwal Niwas, Purani Ginani, Tehsil Bikaner, District Bikaner, (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Saharan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Punia
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
08/10/2018
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Lalit Kumar v. University Grants Commission & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7545/2017, decided on 28.11.2017.
In the said judgment it was, inter alia, directed by the Court
as under:-
“19. Thus in view of the aforesaid observations the present writ petitions are allowed and the respondents are directed to provide relaxation of 5% marks at UG Level, PG
(2 of 2)
[CW-11923/2018]
Level and for assessment of good academic record to the candidates belonging to SC/ST/OBC and PH Category as being mandated by the UGC Regulations of 2010 and 2016. Since already an interim order was operating in favour of the petitioners and they have participated in favour of the petitioners and they have participated in the selection process for the post and the selections have not culminate into finality therefore the present order shall be applicable for all petitioners only as reinitiating the selection shall be prejudicial to all the participating candidates.”
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Lalit Kumar (supra).
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
A.K. Chouhan/-82
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relaxation of 5% marks at UG and PG levels and assessment of good academic record as mandated by UGC Regulations for SC/ST/OBC and PH candidates.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalit Kumar v. University Grants Commission & Ors.Followed¶14
Lalit Kumar v. University Grants Commission & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7545/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhu Ujwal D/o Sh. Abhay Ujwal
State Of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Commionerate Of College Education, Government Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
