Allowed

Aidan Singh v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Rajasthan HC2 Nov 2018CW/7689/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of dues to a retired employee, relying on a prior judgment in Daulat Ram where similar directions were issued to the RSRTC to pay dues and interest within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse the entire dues of all retired employees including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months, carry

Aidan Singh Vs Rsrtc and Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ No. 7689/2018

¶4

Aidan Singh S/o Jethu Singh, R/o Kheme Ka Kua, Patel Basti, Jodhpur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Head Quarter Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jalore Depot.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Ajmeriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harish Purohit

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

02/11/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Harish Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-corporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the persent writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors : SBCWP No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶17

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra), directed as under:-

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-7689/2018]

¶20

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶21

No order as to costs.”

¶22

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶23

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶24

cpgoyal/186

Aidan Singh v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aidan Singh v. Rsrtc and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar Aganihotri Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharda Solanki Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Nain Vs State of Rajasthan

Talsa Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandrshekhar Vs State of Rajasthan