The High Court of Rajasthan examined a writ petition filed by Sukhdev Singh regarding services. The petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition, leading the court to dismiss it as not pressed but directing that the petitioner's case be considered upon vacancy.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed. Respondents directed to consider petitioner's case on vacancy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 588/2017
Sukhdev Singh S/o Amarnath Singh , R/o V.p.o 14-S, Majhiwala, Tehsil Karanpur, District Sriganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhinav Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shweta Bora for Mr. Anil Bissa
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
09/08/2018
After arguing for considerable time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this writ petition at this stage.
Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the respondents are directed that as and when any vacancy arises, the petitioner’s case shall be considered strictly in accordance with law.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
/zeeshan/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's writ petition should be allowed given that the learned counsel did not wish to press it at this stage.
Sukhdev Singh S/o Amarnath Singh
State Of Rajasthan Through The Home Secretary
Commanding Officer , Home Guard, Sri Ganganagar
Dr. Puspendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
