Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Raj and Ors.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶15

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents ventilating his grievances.

¶16

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-3268/2018]

¶19

and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶20

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶21

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶22

SS/452

Rajesh Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lt Col Deepak Tyagi Vs Smt Neha Tyagi

Kallu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Birdhichand Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Laxman Vs Parusram and Ors.

Jamna Lal Dhabai and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Shambhu Singh and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through P P