Remanded

Brajendra Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2018CW/2596/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Rajasthan High Court, on 07/02/2018, disposed of a writ petition regarding contract service benefits by relying on the order dated 21st March, 2017 in Firoj Arif. The disposal is subject to the outcome of a pending intra-court appeal.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is disposed of in terms of the order in Firoj Arif, subject to the decision of the pending intra-court appeal.

Brajendra Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2596 / 2018

¶3

Brajendra Singh S/o Shri Mohan Lal Dorwal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Katrathal Sikar 332024

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶7

Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶8

The Director, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain/Mr.A.K. Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Singhal, Dy.G.C.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶12

Order

¶13

07/02/2018

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gopal Kumawat v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 2963/2007, decided on 29^th July, 2015.

¶15

It is further contended that so far as issue of benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioner on urgent temporary contract basis is concerned; the said issue is pending consideration before the Division Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) Number

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

[CW-2596/2018]

¶18

532/2016: The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal.

¶19

Further, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications lead case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 18268/2016: Firoj Arif v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 21^st March, 2017, observed thus:

¶20

“Consequently, the present bunch of fifty-four writ petitions are disposed of, by issuing following directions:-

¶21

a) That the petitioners during the period of probation are entitled to grant of regular pay scale instead of fixed remuneration as held by Division Bench of this court in the case of Gopal Kumawat vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2963/2007, decided on 29.7.2015, subject to decision of Supreme Court in the pending appeals, wherein validity of judgment rendered in Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) is to be determined.

¶22

b) That in case the judgment rendered in the case of Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) is set aside by the Supreme Court, the petitioners shall be dealt by the respondents State in the light of the judgment to be delivered by the Supreme Court, otherwise, the State of Rajasthan shall abide by the mandate of law laid in Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) by the Division Bench of this Court.

¶23

c) That so far grant of benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioners on urgent temporary contract basis is concerned, the parties to the lis shall abide by the outcome of D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 532/2016, The State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal, pending before Division Bench at Principal Seat at Jodhpur.”

¶24

Learned counsel further prayed that the instant writ

¶25

(3 of 3)

¶26

[CW-2596/2018]

¶27

application be also disposed of in terms of the order in the case of Firoj Arif (supra).

¶28

In view of the statement made; instant writ application stands disposed off in terms of the order dated 21^st March, 2017, in the case of Firoj Arif (supra), as extracted herein above.

¶29

However, instant adjudication would be subject to the decision of the intra-court appeal i.e. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.532 of 2016: The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal, pending before a Division Bench, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.

¶30

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶31

SS/203

Brajendra Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajendra Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Devaram Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Vikas Garg Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Govind Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ram Narayan and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

State Vs Nozomu Sugimoto