Allowed

Salim Khan Pathan v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC10 Dec 2018CW/18477/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition by relying on an identical earlier decision. It directed the respondent Corporation to reimburse retired employees' dues within six months at 6% p.a. interest.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse retired employees of dues under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, and earned leave within six months with 6% interest.

Salim Khan Pathan Vs the Rajasthan State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 18477/2018

¶3

Salim Khan Pathan S/o Meharban Khan, Aged About 61 Years, B/c Pathan, R/o Near Bari Darwaza Masjid, Benganpura Gangapur, District- Bhilwara, (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Managing Director, Head Office, Choumu House,parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶7

The Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Choumu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

The Financial Advisor, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Choumu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶9

The Chief Manager/ Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bhilwara Depot.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Soni. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶13

Order

¶14

10/12/2018

¶15

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Suniel Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-18477/2018]

¶19

No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶20

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra) directed as under :-

¶21

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶22

No order as to costs.”

¶23

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶25

44-PKS/-

Salim Khan Pathan v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salim Khan Pathan v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Chief Eng. Water Resources and Ors. Vs Narendra Kumar

Madan Lal Dhobi Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Babu Singh and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Devi Singh Chouhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Kanwar Vs State of Rajasthan