Allowed

Ram Singh Rathore v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC3 Nov 2018CW/16957/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a short order, the High Court allowed the writ petition by relying on a previous judgment (Daulat Ram). The petitioner is directed to the same relief granted in the cited case regarding reimbursement of retired employee dues, to be complied with within six months.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of retired employees and pay interest at 6% p.a. within six months.

Ram Singh Rathore Vs Rajasthan State Road… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ No. 16957/2018

¶4

Ram Singh Rathore S/o Shri Chhagan Singh, Aged About 60 Years, By Caste Rajput, Resident Of House No. 34, Pushpa Nagar, Banswara.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director.

¶8

The Chief Manager, Banswara Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Banswara.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

03/11/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Sunil Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-16957/2018]

¶19

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶20

directed as under :-

¶21

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶22

No order as to costs.”

¶23

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J.

¶25

Sumit-40

Ram Singh Rathore v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Singh Rathore v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Ram Vs the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Mishri Lal Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shri Adarsh High School Samiti Vs National Council for Teacher Education

Magaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaje Singh Samariya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Satyapal Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan