Allowed

Balwant Ram v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC2 Nov 2018CW/13566/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the writ petition following a prior decision in Daulat Ram, directing the respondent Corporation to reimburse retired employees' dues including retirement benefits, overtime, and allowances with interest within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent Corporation to reimburse the entire dues of all retired employees including retirement benefits, overtime, night allowance, and earned leave within six months, with interes

Balwant Ram Vs the Rajasthan State Road… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13566/2018

¶3

Balwant Ram S/o Shri Niku Ram, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Banda Colony, Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar (Retired At Rsrct Khetdi Depot On 30.05.2013)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director.

¶7

The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, District Jhunjhnu.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shardul Bishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

02/11/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Sunil Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-13566/2018]

¶19

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

¶20

directed as under :-

¶21

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶22

No order as to costs.”

¶23

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J.

¶25

Sumit-130

Balwant Ram v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balwant Ram v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaukat Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Anish Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Khushala Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mishri Lal Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shri Adarsh High School Samiti Vs National Council for Teacher Education

Shankar Lal Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan