This High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Aarti W/o Shyamlal regarding recruitment of Safai Karamcharis, deciding it in accordance with the judgment in Ravi Jajot (2018). The Court directed the respondents to pass a speaking order within thirty days.
Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to pass speaking orders for affected candidates within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 15373/2018
Aarti W/o Shyamlal, Aged About 38 Years, Caste Mehttar, R/o Prithvipura Rasala Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Champawat for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
03/10/2018
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10496/2018 , decided on 30.8.2018 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in terms of the said judgment.
In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court after dealing with the issues, raised therein, inter alia, directed as under:-
(2 of 2)
[CW-15373/2018]
“95. The grievances of the candidates having extraordinary sports skills were also taken up by this Court, and after hearing learned counsel for the parties on the said issue, this Court finds that since they are dependent upon the settled parameters of giving preference to the sports persons, this Court directs that the representations of such sports persons shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order, while giving them proper opportunity of hearing, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. Further, while making such consideration, the criteria for sports persons, as mentioned in such representations, shall also be duly dealt with and considered by the respondents, strictly in accordance with law.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in terms of judgment in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra) with similar directions as noticed hereinbefore.
A.K. Chouhan/-415
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition based on the judgment in Ravi Jajot (supra).
Whether to direct the respondents to pass a speaking order within thirty days.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶15
Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10496/2018
Aarti W/o Shyamlal
State Of Rajasthan
Director And Joint Local Self Government Department
Collector, District Jodhpur
Chief Executive Officer, Jodhpur Municipal Corporation
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
