Allowed

Prithvi Singh Shishodia v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2018CW/13909/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking dues. Relying on a prior judgment in Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. (2015), the Court held the petition liable to be allowed and directed the same relief to the respondent Corporation.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was allowed; respondent Corporation directed to reimburse entire dues of retired employees with 6% interest within six months.

Prithvi Singh Shishodia Vs Rajasthan State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13909/2018

¶3

Prithvi Singh Shishodia S/o Shri Indra Singh, Aged About 63 Years, By Caste Rajput, Resident Of Village Post Nandli, Ahada, Tehsil Sabla, District Dungarpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Its Managing Director.

¶7

The Chief Manager, Dungarpur Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Dungarpur.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

01/10/2018

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Sunil

¶15

Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶17

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra) directed as under :-

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-13909/2018]

¶20

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶21

No order as to costs.”

¶22

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶23

(ARUN BHANSALI),J.

¶24

Sumit-9

Prithvi Singh Shishodia v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prithvi Singh Shishodia v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Tamboli Vs State of Rajasthan

Sapna Audichya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Vs State of Rajasthan

Kunj Behari Swami Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Smt. Sampat Kanwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Har Gopal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan