Disposed

Ganesh Kumar Prajapat v. Dr Pradeep Kumar Goyal

Rajasthan HC26 Nov 2018CW/1050/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan closed these writ proceedings after parties reached a consensus. The petitioner agreed to vacate by December 31, 2019, pay arrears, and submit an undertaking to the Rent Tribunal. The Court directed continued payment of mesne profits and warned of contempt for breach.

What did the court decide?

Writ proceedings closed; petitioner to vacate by 31-12-2019, pay arrears and mesne profits, and submit undertaking before Rent Tribunal.

Ganesh Kumar Prajapat Vs Dr Pradeep Kumar Goyal — Landlord and Tenant | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 1050/2018

¶3

Ganesh Kumar Prajapat S/o Late Shri Dhanna Lal, By Caste Prajapat, R/o Tambe Ki Tori, Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Goyal S/o Late Shri Damodar Lal Goyal, By Caste Mahajan, R/o Choudharipada, Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli

¶7

	----R	espondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. J.P. Goyal, Senior	Counsel,
	assisted by Mr. Abhi Goyal

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶9

Order

¶10

26/11/2018

¶11

Counsel for the petitioner gives out that petitioner has agreed to the proposal of the counsel for the respondent(s), to vacate the premises involved herein, on or before 31^st December, 2019.

¶12

In view of conscious consensus arrived at between the parties; the instant writ proceedings stand closed, with the following directions:

¶13

(a) Petitioner shall be entitled to continue in occupation of the rented premises involved herein with the condition that he would handover vacant possession of the premises in question to the respondents on or before 31^st December, 2019.

¶14

(b) Petitioner shall pay arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today.

¶15

(c) Petitioner shall continue to pay the mesne profits @ Rs.600/(Rupees: Six Hundred Only), with effect from December, 2018, on or before 10^th of every month.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-1050/2018]

¶18

(d) The petitioner shall not alienate/transfer or otherwise create any third party rights or handover possession of the premises involved herein to any other person.

¶19

The petitioner is further directed to submit an undertaking incorporating the conditions, as detailed out herein above, before the concerned Rent Tribunal within a period of 30 days from today.

¶20

In case, the petitioner fails to submit the undertaking with the conditions aforesaid and as directed by this Court, within the period aforesaid or committed any breach of the terms and conditions detailed herein above; such an act shall tantamount to contempt of Court. Further, the respondents shall be entitled to recourse to execution proceedings for eviction of the petitioner from the rented premises and shall be entitled to possession of the premises involved herein, in accordance with law.

¶21

With the terms and conditions as indicated above, writ proceedings stand closed.

¶22

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶23

SS/169

Ganesh Kumar Prajapat v. Dr Pradeep Kumar Goyal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Kumar Prajapat v. Dr Pradeep Kumar Goyal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sharan Modi Vs State Mines Department Ors.

Laxminarayan Gupta Son of Late Shri Sohan Lal Vs Jaipur Municipal Corporation

Radhey Shyam Kumawat S/O Shri Gendilal Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Navya Sharma Vs Regional Director

Sanskar Shiksha Samiti Vs National Council for Teacher Education

Anmol Education and Welfare Society, Vs the National Council for Teacher Education