Smt Savita v. Chandra Prakash Vedwal
Case brief
What is this about?
t;iqj ihB] t;iqj ,dyihB flfoy vUrj.k…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj ,dyihB flfoy vUrj.k izkFkZuk i= la[;k&70@2017
vkns'k fnukad%& 15&01&2018 ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk
mifLFkr%&
vf/koDrk okLrs izkFkhZ %& Jh lR;e [k.MsyokyA vf/koDrk okLrs vizkFkhZ %&
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vUrj.k izkFkZuk i= vizkFkhZ pUnzizdk'k }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= la[;k&87@2017 vUrxZr /kkjk&13 fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e] pUnzizdk'k cuke lfork dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; vtesj ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; t;iqj esa LFkkukUrfjr djus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A
bl vUrj.k izkFkZuk i= ds uksfVl vizkFkhZ dks tkjh fd, x, Fks tks fd vizkFkhZ ij fnukad 08-10-2017 dks rkehy gks pqds gSa ijUrq vizkFkhZ ckotwn rkehy mifLFkr ugha gS A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ Jh lR;e [k.Msyoky dk dFku gS fd iwoZ esa Hkh vizkFkhZ us ,d izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 13 fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e fookg foPNsn gsrq ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; vtesj esa izLrqr fd;k Fkk tks fd bl U;k;ky; dh lg ihB ds vkns'k fnukad 08-02-2005 ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dze&1] t;iqj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;k x;k Fkk A mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 125 lh-vkj-ih-lh- ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dze&1 t;iqj uxj }kjk fuLrkfjr fd;k x;k Fkk ftldh olwyh dh dk;Zokgh ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dze&1 t;iqj esa fopkjk/khu gS A mudk fuosnu gS fd bu rF;ksa ds izdk'k esa vihykFkhZ dk ;g izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk&13 fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e dks t;iqj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tkos A
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jh lR;e [k.Msyoky
- respondent
Punjab Subsinthetic India Limited
Coram
Jh izdk'k xqIrk
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CTA/70/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court