Single judge order in a writ petition where the petitioner informed the court of subsequent appointment, rendering the application infructuous, leading to closure of proceedings without adjudication.
Writ proceedings declared closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11387 / 2017
Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Post Office Kohla, Ward No. 5, Hanumangarh Town, Rajasthan-335513
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajatshatru Mina
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. F. Baig
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
15/01/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions submits that in view of the subsequent events more particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has been accorded appointment; the writ application has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made, the writ proceedings stand closed.
Needless to observe that the petitioner would be at liberty to institute writ application afresh, with reference to any subsequent cause of action, if need be.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
Pooja/244
Krishan Kumar
State of Rajasthan
Department of Treasuries & Accounts
Department of Personnel
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
