Disposed

Jogendra Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2018CRLW/812/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants the prayer in a writ petition filed by the complainant seeking a direction for a fair and impartial investigation in a criminal case. The court noted the apex court's assurance and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The court granted the prayer of the petitioner to dispose of the Writ petition in the manner suggested by the Additional Government Advocate.

Jogendra Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand B/C Meena Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Writ No. 812/2018

¶3

Jogendra Kumar S/o Shri Phool Chand B/c Meena, R/o Plot No.b82, Maa Karni Nagar, Meenawala, Ward No.12, Police Station Karnivihar, District Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range Ii, Jaipur.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police Jaipur Rural Station Road Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶10

Station House Officer, Police Station Govindgarh, Jaipur.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda For Respondent(s) : MR. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, AGA

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

Order

01/10/2018

Heard.

The instant Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the complainant/petitioner praying interalia that a direction be issued to the respondents to conduct fair, proper, impartial and expeditious investigation in a case arising out of FIR No. 38/2018, registered at Police Station Govindgarh, Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 447, 427 and 379 of IPC.

¶18

(2 of 2) [CRLW-812/2018]

¶19

The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, to allay the apprehension of the complainant/petitioner, at the out set, has submitted that if the investigation report is not submitted yet than not only fair investigation shall be conducted, but the report of investigation, along with the opinion of the Investigating Officer shall be submitted before the Magistrate having jurisdiction expeditiously.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the complainant/petitioner submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶21

Ordered accordingly.

¶22

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA),J

¶23

S. Kumawat/52

Jogendra Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jogendra Kumar S/O Shri Phool Chand B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Deepa Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Mujiburrahman S/O Shri Altafurrahman B/C Musalman Deswali Vs Abdul Rashid S/O Shri Abdul Hafiz B/C Musalman

Pappu @ Chitrapal S/O Jangaliya, by Caste Jat Vs State of Rajasthan, through Its Public Prosecutor

Nehru Lal Vs State Finance Departmentors

Sitaram Son of Shri Boduram @ Surjaram, by Caste Jat Vs Director General of Police (Prisoners)

Tejraj Son of Dhanraj Meena Vs State of Rajasthan through Secretary