Shyam Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed multiple criminal revision petitions by petitioners challenging proceedings against them, holding them infructuous after prosecution evidence began.
What did the court decide?
Revision petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 443/2018
Ganpat S/o Madhav Lal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, P.s. Ambamata, Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Revision No. 347/2018 Ajay Chanal S/o Shambhulal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, Ambamata, Udaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
Ajay Chanal S/o Shambhulal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, Ambamata, Udaipur.
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 407/2018
Sunil S/o Shambhulal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, P.s. Ambamata, Udaipur.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganpat S/o Madhav Lal
- petitioner
Ajay Chanal S/o Shambhulal
- petitioner
Sunil S/o Shambhulal
- petitioner
Srikant S/o Bhagirath
- petitioner
Shyam Lal S/o Madhav Lal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/476/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court