Ganpat v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposed of five connected criminal revision petitions by dismissing them as infructuous since the prosecution had already commenced recording evidence.
What did the court decide?
Petitions dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 443/2018
Ganpat S/o Madhav Lal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, P.s. Ambamata, Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 347/2018
Ajay Chanal S/o Shambhulal, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of Gandhi Nagar, Malla Talai, Ambamata, Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal revision petitions become infructuous once prosecution evidence has commenced.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganpat S/o Madhav Lal
- petitioner
Ajay Chanal S/o Shambhulal
- petitioner
Sunil S/o Shambhulal
- petitioner
Srikant S/o Bhagirath
- petitioner
Shyam Lal S/o Madhav Lal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/443/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court