Criminal revision petition held infructuous due to amicable settlement between parties and accordingly dismissed.
Petition rendered infructuous due to settlement; ordered accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1046/2014
----Petitioners
Versus
–---Non-Petitioner
| For Petitioner(s) | ----Complainant-Non-Petitioner : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar Adv. |
|---|---|
| For State | : Mr. R.R. Gurjar, P.P. |
| For Complainant | : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan Adv. on behalf of Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan Adv. |
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment
26/10/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as parties have amicably settled their dispute.
Ordered accordingly.
(SABINA)J.
S.Kumawat-268
Dinesh Verma
Ramjilal Verma
State Of Rajasthan
Nirmala Kasotiya
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
