The High Court at Jaipur held that the criminal revision rendered infructuous due to the amicable settlement of the dispute between parties.
Held the revision rendered infructuous as parties have amicably settled their dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1000/2014
----Accused/Petitioners Versus
–---Non-Petitioner
----Complainant-Non-Petitioner
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar Adv. |
|---|---|
| For State | : Mr. R.R. Gurjar, P.P. |
| For Complainant | : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan Adv. on behalf |
| of Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan Adv. |
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment
26/10/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as parties have amicably settled their dispute.
Ordered accordingly.
(SABINA)J.
S.Kumawat-267
Ramjilal Verma
Dinesh Verma
State Of Rajasthan
Nirmala Kasotiya
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
