The high court dismissed an appellants criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous because the court below had received and acted upon a final report (FR) from the police.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 5881 / 2017
Prince Jain S/o Shri Lal Sahab Jain, by Jain, aged about 26 years, R/o Katra, Mohalla, Hanuman Bagaria, Bhind, P.S. Kotwali City, District Bhind, (M.P.).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
----Complainant-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamlendra Sihag
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Meenakshi Pareek, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Judgment / Order
09/02/2018
Learned Public Prosecutor submits the report received from SHO, P.S. Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur. According to which, FR (negative report) has been submitted before the competent Court on 15.12.2017.
In view of above, counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this misc. petition.
The misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DEEPAK MAHESHWARI)J.
Arun/13
Prince Jain S/o Shri Lal Sahab Jain
State Of Raj through PP
Sunny Jain S/o Shri Sukhveer Jain
Deepak Maheshwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
