Dismissed

Kanaram and Anr. v. State and Anr.

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2018CRLMP/506/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR for cheating, forgery, and extortion. The investigation was completed by the I.O. who found the petitioners prima facie guilty. The petition was not pressed by counsel.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to move appropriate representation before appropriate authority while submitting defence.

Kanaram and Anr. Vs State and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 506/2018

¶3

Kanaram Son Of Mishrilal Meghwal, by caste Meghwal, Resident of C.S. 88, Shivaji Nagar, Pali.

¶4

Smt. Premlata Wife Of Kanaram Meghwal, by caste Meghwal, Resident of C.S.-88, Shivaji Nagar, Pali.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan

¶8

Devendra Daga Son Of Shri Padam Chand Daga, By Caste Jain, Resident Of A-33, Veer Durgadas Nagar, Pali.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)

¶11

: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, Mr. Arpit Mehta

¶12

For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, PP

¶13

Mr. G.R. Punia, Sr. Advocate

¶14

Mr. Farzand Ali, Mr. Naman Mohnot

¶15

Mr. Milan Kumar Johiya, I.O., Addl. S.P., CID (CB), Jaipur, present in person.

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶17

Judgment / Order

¶18

01/08/2018

¶19

This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners with a prayer for quashing the FIR No.07/2017 of Police Station Kotwali, Distt. Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 384 and 389 IPC.

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

In the impugned FIR, the investigation was assigned to the CID (CB) and Mr. Milan Kumar Johiya, I.O., Addl. S.P., CID (CB), present in person before this Court today, has investigated into the allegations levelled in the above referred FIR. It is submitted by the I.O. that he has already completed the investigation in the above referred FIR and found that the petitioners along with two other accused persons namely Anil Kumar Jain and Suresh Maheshwari are prima facie guilty of offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 469, 474 and 120-B IPC. It is further stated by the I.O. that he has already submitted his report to the Addl. Director General of Police, CID (CB), Jaipur and further proceedings will be conducted as per his instructions.

¶22

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this criminal misc. petition, however, seeks liberty for the petitioners to move appropriate representation before the appropriate authority while submitting their defence.

¶23

Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.

¶24

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶25

ms rathore

Kanaram and Anr. v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanaram and Anr. v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramba Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Pargat Singh Vs State and Anr.

Ashok Leyland Finace Vs State and Anr.

Gajiya Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Daga Vs State and Anr.

Ankush Wadhawa Vs State and Anr.