Disposed

Veerpal Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jul 2018CRLMP/2144/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a bail petition seeking police protection for major minors married against family wishes. The Court directed the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police with a representation for threat assessment instead of granting direct protection in this order.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to move representation before Superintendent of Police for threat analysis instead of granting immediate protection.

Veerpal Kaur Vs State of Rajasthan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2144/2018

¶4

Veerpal Kaur W/o Shri Sonu , Aged About 28 Years, D/o Banta Singh, B/c Raisikh, R/o Sabu Ki Mod, 1 K.k. Teh. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶5

Sonu , Aged About 21 Years, B/c Raisikh, R/o 1 K.k. Teh. Padampur,

¶6

----Petitioners Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan , Through Pp

¶8

The SHO, Police Station Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶9

Shri Banta Singh , Aged About 60 Years, B/c Rai Sikh, R/o Sabu Ki Mod, Teh. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶10

Dhanno Bai , Aged About 55 Years, B/c Rai Sikh, R/o Sabu Ki Mod, Teh. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶11

Pooran Singh , B/c Rai Sikh, R/o Sabu Ki Mod, Teh. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶12

Sunita , Aged About 40 Years, B/c Rai Sikh, R/o Sabu Ki Mod, Teh. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Thind For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, P.P. Smt. Veerpal Kaur Mr. Sonu, petitioners present in person

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶16

Order

¶17

23/07/2018

¶18

This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers :-

¶19

(2 of 3)

¶20

[CRLMP-2144/2018]

¶21

“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this the record of the case may kindly be called for and by an appropriate orders:

¶22

(a) The criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed.

¶23

(b) That the respondent No.1 and 2 may kindly be directed to provide protection and safety to the petitioners by restraining the family members of the petitioners wife and respondent No.3 to 6.

¶24

¶25

(d) any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioners.”

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are major and as per their own will have married to each other but their family members are annoyed with their marriage and threatened them with dire consequences, therefore, adequate police protection be provided to them.

¶27

After considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension regarding their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation before the Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar narrating their grievance.

¶28

It is expected that if any such representation is moved on behalf of the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Sri

¶29

(3 of 3)

¶30

[CRLMP-2144/2018]

¶31

Ganganagar shall consider the same and after analysing the threat perceptions, if requires so, may pass necessary orders.

¶32

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶33

With these observations, this criminal misc. petition is disposed of. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶34

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

Veerpal Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veerpal Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Lal Vs State and Anr.

Gopi @ Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan

Poornima Rajpurohit Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal and Anr. Vs State and Anr.

Deendayal Vs State and Ors.

Raju Vs State and Ors.