Disposed

Yogesh Singhal Agarwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2018CRLMP/202/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of an interim bail petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., directing that nonbailable warrants against the petitioner be kept in abeyance for three weeks. The court ordered the trial court to decide the bail application according to law.

What did the court decide?

Directs that nonbailable warrants against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance for three weeks to enable surrender and filing of bail application.

Yogesh Singhal Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 202/2017

¶3

Yogesh Singhal (Agarwal) S/o Radheyshyam B/c Mahajan, R/o Village Chainpur Vardiya, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli, At Present R/o C-24, Barkat Nagar Extension, Jaipur, Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶7

			----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Azad Ahmed
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. N.S. Dhakad,	Public Prosecutor

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

¶9

/ Order

¶10

04/04/2018

¶11

Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the accused-petitioner praying interalia that the order dated 29.08.2016 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge & Metropolitan Magistrate, No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 70 (2) Cr.P.C. for converting arrest warrants into bailable warrants, has been rejected, be set aside. It is further prayed that the order dated 04.10.2016 passed by the revisional Court below, whereby revision filed by the petitioner against the order dated 29.08.2016 was dismissed, be also set aside.

¶12

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, during the course of arguments, has submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to surrender before the trial Court and apply for bail.

¶13

Having heard ld. counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of, by issuing a direction that the nonbailable warrants issued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMP-202/2017]

¶16

for a period of three weeks to enable the petitioner to surrender before the trial Court and apply for bail.

¶17

Needless to say that the trial Court shall decide the bail application of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of law without being influenced of any observations made herein above by this Court.

¶18

It is clarified that in case, the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Court within the stipulated period of three weeks, the present order shall cease to operate and law shall take its own course.

¶19

In view of the above, the present petition is, disposed of. Upon final disposal of the main petition, the stay application filed therewith does not survive and same is also disposed of.

¶20

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J

¶21

ashok

Yogesh Singhal Agarwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Singhal Agarwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jahid Ali Vs Sabir Ali and Ors.

Bhuri Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Ramkesh Vs Surendra Kumar and Others

Mohini Devi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Parmila Vs State Medical and Health Ors.

Savita Sharma Vs State Medical and Health Ors.