The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The court relied on the inordinate delay in lodging the FIR despite the complainant's knowledge. Bail was granted with a personal bond and two sureties.
Bail allowed; personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 818 / 2018
Sumer @ Batoi S/o Majeera B/c Chaturvedi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Saypur, Police Station, Kudgaon, Distt. Karauli (raj.) (presently Confined in Jail At Karauli)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesdh Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
22/01/2018
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-818/2018]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.
Arti/66
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed considering the inordinate delay in lodging the FIR despite the complainant's knowledge of the offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumer @ Batoi S/o Majeera B/c Chaturvedi
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
