The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed the criminal miscellaneous bail application as not pressed, but granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after the Investigating Officer records their statement.
Liberty to file fresh bail application after recording of statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 6424/2018
Pradeep Kumar S/o Bhup Singh, Aged About 31 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Bhurat Kalla, Elnabad Ps, Dist Sirsa (Haryana) (Sub Jail, Rajgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Shreekant Verma : Mr. A.S. Rathore, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
26/11/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application, however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of the statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Taruna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after recording of the statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradeep Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
