Allowed

Amarjeet Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC26 Nov 2018CRLMB/11683/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner faced offences under Sections 323, 342, 395, and 420 IPC. The court granted bail noting that co-accused were already on bail, directing release on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Amarjeet Singh Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 11683/2018

¶3

Amarjeet Singh S/o Sh. Mewa Singh, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Jat Sikh, 13 M.d. , Tehsil Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar. (Lodged In Sub Jail Anupgarh)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Gharsana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Avasti, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶10

Order

¶11

26/11/2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.166/2018 of Police Station Nai Mandi, Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 342, 395 and 420 I.P.C. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that coaccused persons have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused persons.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-11683/2018]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, however, he is not in position to dispute the fact that the coaccused have already been enlarged on bail.

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Amarjeet Singh S/o Sh. Mewa Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.166/2018 of Police Station Nai Mandi, Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶20

122-Babulal/-

Amarjeet Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amarjeet Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar Singh Vs State

Jageer Singh @ Gurbeer Singh Vs State

Sharvan Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Balbeer Singh Vs State

Dhara Singh Vs State

Mehram Vs State of Rajasthan