Allowed

Aslam@Bagga@Islam v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC11 May 2018CRLMB/5899/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a bail application filed by an accused charged with theft. The court directed the petitioner to be released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 along with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions of appearance and no repetition of offense.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Aslam@Bagga@Islam Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 5899/2018

¶3

Aslam @ Bagga @ Islam S/o Lt. Shri Peer Mohmmad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Behind Of Talai Kante, Police Station Kotwali, District Tonk. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan ? Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶9

Judgment / Order

¶10

11/05/2018

¶11

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section

¶12

439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No.03/2018 was registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur Metropolitan for offence under Sections 379, 411 of I.P.C.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the matter pertains to theft of Maruti car. Car has been recovered from coaccused who has been enlarged on bail by the Court below.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

His contention is that petitioner has criminal antecedents

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-5899/2018]

¶21

petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶22

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner repeats the offence, State would be free to move application for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.

¶24

A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that in the event of petitoner's repeating offence, S.H.O. can move the Court for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶26

Arti/63

Aslam@Bagga@Islam v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aslam@Bagga@Islam v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Singh Vs State of Raj and Anr.

State of Rajasthan Vs Hanuman Bairwa

Jitendra@Jeetu Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Bheem Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Laxman Das Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Mst Anguri Vs Smt Roopwati